Supreme Court Considers Trump’s Push to End Birthright Citizenship
The U.S. Supreme Court is now hearing a major case that challenges former President Donald Trump’s executive order. This order aims to end birthright citizenship. The outcome could significantly affect immigration policy and expand presidential authority.
Trump issued the order in January, soon after returning to office. He declared that children born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants should not automatically receive citizenship. His administration argues that this interpretation of the 14th Amendment is flawed. They claim the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes children of undocumented or temporary residents.
Legal and Constitutional Clash
Three federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington quickly blocked the order. They issued nationwide injunctions. In response, the Trump administration argued that lower courts exceeded their authority by halting actions across the country. Trump’s legal team claims these “universal injunctions” prevent the president from enforcing policies and keeping campaign promises.
If the Supreme Court supports Trump, it could give future presidents more power through executive orders. This would apply even to deeply rooted constitutional matters like birthright citizenship. However, many constitutional experts disagree. They believe ending this right would require a formal amendment, not just a presidential order.
Potential Impact on U.S.-Born Children
This case stems from three lawsuits filed by immigration advocates and 22 U.S. states. Nearly 40 injunctions have been issued since Trump’s second term began. These reflect strong legal resistance to his immigration policies.
Experts warn of serious consequences. Ending or limiting birthright citizenship could leave some children stateless. These children, born in the U.S., might not qualify for citizenship in their parents’ home countries either. According to immigration attorney Alex Cuic, this change could create a group of “second-class” citizens. It would also cause uncertainty about their legal rights and future.
